H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alexandra Fusai vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 3-0
Alexandra Fusai holds a 3–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alexandra Fusai leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alexandra Fusai won the 1997 Birmingham second round 6-1 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 52
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 54
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1997* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Alexandra Fusai | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
| May 26, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Alexandra Fusai | 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1993* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Alexandra Fusai | 6-4 6-0 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Fusai | #1,030 | #37 | 691 | 1,759 | 89 | 147 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Noelle Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,659 | 56 | 96 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandra Fusai | Noelle Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #92 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #39 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #177 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #144 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |