H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexandra Panova vs Aiko Nakamura H2H: 0-1
Aiko Nakamura holds a 1–0 lead over Alexandra Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aiko Nakamura leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aiko Nakamura won the 2010 Osaka third round 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 42
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2010* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Aiko Nakamura | 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | Alexandra Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Panova | #1,014 | #71 | 890 | 1,546 | 32 | 52 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aiko Nakamura | #730 | #47 | 569 | 1,645 | 50 | 76 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandra Panova | Aiko Nakamura | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #208 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #153 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #71 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #57 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #88 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #66 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #135 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #146 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #133 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #677 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |