H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alexia Dechaume Balleret vs Ann Grossman H2H: 1-0
Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1992 Los Angeles third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1992* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-3 6-2 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |