H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexia Dechaume Balleret vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 1-0
Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 1–0 lead over Bettina Fulco in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1992 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-4 6-1 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |