H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alexia Dechaume Balleret vs Donna Faber H2H: 2-0
Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 2–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1992 Schenectady third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1992* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-4 6-1 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1992* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-0 6-2 | Donna Faber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |