H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alexia Dechaume Balleret vs Eugenia Maniokova H2H: 0-1
Eugenia Maniokova holds a 1–0 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eugenia Maniokova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eugenia Maniokova won the 1992 Hamburg third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1992* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Eugenia Maniokova | 6-2 6-2 | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eugenia Maniokova | #579 | #66 | 18 | 1,587 | 22 | 48 | 31.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Eugenia Maniokova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #107 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #87 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #163 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #116 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #166 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |