H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alexia Dechaume Balleret vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 1-2
Leila Meskhi holds a 2–1 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1995 Paris third round 2-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1995* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 2-2 (ret.) | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 4-6 6-0 7-6(4) | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1992* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 6-3 6-4 | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |