H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Alexia Dechaume Balleret vs Liz Smylie H2H: 1-1

Alexia Dechaume Balleret and Liz Smylie are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1991 Sydney International round of 64 7-5 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alexia Dechaume Balleret
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alexia Dechaume Balleret 7-5 2-6 6-4 Liz Smylie #53 Match data Jan 9, 1991* R64 Sydney International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Liz Smylie #182 3-6 6-1 6-2 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Jan 11, 1989* R64 Sydney International WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,738 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Liz Smylie #501 #20 29 1,823 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Liz Smylie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,539 0 0 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1
18 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1
19 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,491 0 0 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3
20 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,600 0 0 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4
21 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,645 0 0 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4
22 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,733 0 0 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,729 0 4
23 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,710 0 0 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,668 0 4
24 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,747 0 5
25 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5
26 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,576 0 0 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,681 0 5
27 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,620 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5
28 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,592 0 0 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5
29 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,571 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5
30 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Liz Smylie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
18 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
19 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — —
20 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1991 10 11 21 47.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1997 9 8 17 52.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1998 3 9 12 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career — 59 86 145 40.7% 51 67 118 43.2% 10 16 26 38.5% 7 12 19 36.8% — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Liz Smylie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1517 105.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1539 124.4 — — — — +28 +26 — 42.1% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +1.23 1980 1630 113.8 — — — — — — +68 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.27
18 1988 1532 116.8 — — — — — +56 +5 40.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.04 1981 1516 99.0 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.93
19 1989 1492 117.1 — — — — -9 +59 — 36.4% -1.11 0–6 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 92.8 +0.68 1982 1628 117.1 — — — — — +36 +61 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.87
20 1990 1601 116.0 — — — — -64 -22 -5 51.7% -0.12 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 108.0 +1.41 1983 1754 135.8 — — — — -168 -34 +79 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.10
21 1991 1645 125.3 — — — — -25 -89 -62 49.3% +0.04 1–8 (11%) 1–1 — -0.53 1984 1765 122.9 — — — — -245 -129 +140 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.5 -1.24
22 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -43 -63 — 52.2% +0.31 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.1 -0.96 1985 1730 128.1 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.38
23 1993 1710 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00 1986 1669 119.0 — — — — -124 -109 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.61
24 1994 1705 133.1 — — — — -51 +24 — 51.9% +0.11 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.41 1987 1747 133.3 — — — — -128 — +164 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.13
25 1995 1585 113.1 — — — — +35 +34 — 22.5% -1.58 1–1 0–2 — -0.50 1988 1607 97.5 — — — — -90 — +200 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.27
26 1996 1576 120.4 — — — — +9 +78 — 35.7% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 100.2 -0.64 1989 1682 124.8 — — — — -34 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.75
27 1997 1621 127.1 — — — — +3 +66 — 52.8% -0.01 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.3 +0.82 1990 1665 124.3 — — — — +4 — +123 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59
28 1998 1592 121.9 — — — — -25 +71 +3 36.8% -0.87 5–7 (42%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 -1.11 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -44 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32
29 1999 1572 115.6 — — — — +3 +13 +1 40.9% -0.94 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.3 -0.59 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
30 2000 1556 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.12 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11
Career — 1739 130.0 — — — — -16 +20 -8 44.0% -0.45 32–62 (34%) 28–29 (49%) 94.0 +0.13 — 1824 127.3 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.