H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Alexia Dechaume Balleret vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-3

Lori Mcneil holds a 3–1 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1996 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alexia Dechaume Balleret
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alexia Dechaume Balleret 6-3 6-3 Lori Mcneil #43 Match data Mar 22, 1996* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lori Mcneil #17 6-3 6-3 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Jan 18, 1995* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lori Mcneil #17 2-6 6-3 1-0 (ret.) Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Aug 18, 1994* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lori Mcneil #14 6-2 6-3 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Feb 12, 1987* R32 Oklahoma WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,738 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,539 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,491 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,600 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,645 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,733 0 0 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,710 0 0 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,576 0 0 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,620 0 0 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,592 0 0 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,571 0 0 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 10 11 21 47.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1997 9 8 17 52.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 1998 3 9 12 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 86 145 40.7% 51 67 118 43.2% 10 16 26 38.5% 7 12 19 36.8% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1517 105.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1987 1539 124.4 — — — — +28 +26 — 42.1% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +1.23 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1988 1532 116.8 — — — — — +56 +5 40.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.04 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1989 1492 117.1 — — — — -9 +59 — 36.4% -1.11 0–6 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 92.8 +0.68 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1990 1601 116.0 — — — — -64 -22 -5 51.7% -0.12 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 108.0 +1.41 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27
21 1991 1645 125.3 — — — — -25 -89 -62 49.3% +0.04 1–8 (11%) 1–1 — -0.53 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20
22 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -43 -63 — 52.2% +0.31 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.1 -0.96 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49
23 1993 1710 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78
24 1994 1705 133.1 — — — — -51 +24 — 51.9% +0.11 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.41 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06
25 1995 1585 113.1 — — — — +35 +34 — 22.5% -1.58 1–1 0–2 — -0.50 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23
26 1996 1576 120.4 — — — — +9 +78 — 35.7% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 100.2 -0.64 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 1997 1621 127.1 — — — — +3 +66 — 52.8% -0.01 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.3 +0.82 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 1998 1592 121.9 — — — — -25 +71 +3 36.8% -0.87 5–7 (42%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 -1.11 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 1999 1572 115.6 — — — — +3 +13 +1 40.9% -0.94 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.3 -0.59 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 2000 1556 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.12 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1739 130.0 — — — — -16 +20 -8 44.0% -0.45 32–62 (34%) 28–29 (49%) 94.0 +0.13 — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.