H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 2–1 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on clay, while Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1995 Strasbourg Open round of 32 6-4 5-7 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 5-7 6-0 | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Match data | May 25, 1995* | R32 | Strasbourg Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-1 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Aug 24, 1991* | SF | Schenectady | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 7-6 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Jun 19, 1991* | R64 | Eastbourne Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,738 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,850 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1986 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1988 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1990 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1987 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 1991 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1992 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1994 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1991 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1995 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1996 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 1997 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1994 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 1998 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1995 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 1999 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1996 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 59 | 86 | 145 | 40.7% | 51 | 67 | 118 | 43.2% | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | Career | 125 | 129 | 254 | 49.2% | 7 | 20 | 27 | 25.9% | 11 | 20 | 31 | 35.5% | 33 | 33 | 66 | 50.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1986 | 1517 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 | 1983 | 1492 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 1987 | 1539 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | +26 | — | 42.1% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +1.23 | 1984 | 1478 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.29 |
| 1988 | 1532 | 116.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +56 | +5 | 40.0% | -1.02 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–0 | — | +0.04 | 1985 | 1542 | 112.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 63.2% | +0.89 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 1989 | 1492 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +59 | — | 36.4% | -1.11 | 0–6 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 92.8 | +0.68 | 1986 | 1683 | 123.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.34 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–1 (83%) | — | +1.30 |
| 1990 | 1601 | 116.0 | — | — | — | — | -64 | -22 | -5 | 51.7% | -0.12 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–1 (86%) | 108.0 | +1.41 | 1987 | 1659 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | -85 | 41.9% | -0.77 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.83 |
| 1991 | 1645 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -89 | -62 | 49.3% | +0.04 | 1–8 (11%) | 1–1 | — | -0.53 | 1988 | 1587 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | -37 | 37.3% | -1.03 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.4 | -1.05 |
| 1992 | 1733 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | -43 | -63 | — | 52.2% | +0.31 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.1 | -0.96 | 1989 | 1592 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | -6 | — | — | 44.1% | -0.25 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.6 | +2.41 |
| 1993 | 1710 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | 1990 | 1746 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -257 | — | 51.7% | +0.10 | 7–10 (41%) | 6–4 (60%) | 103.1 | -0.70 |
| 1994 | 1705 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +24 | — | 51.9% | +0.11 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.41 | 1991 | 1740 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -243 | -169 | 48.9% | -0.13 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 103.3 | +0.98 |
| 1995 | 1585 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | +34 | — | 22.5% | -1.58 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.50 | 1992 | 1697 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | -146 | 48.5% | 0.00 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.1 | +0.32 |
| 1996 | 1576 | 120.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +78 | — | 35.7% | -1.19 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.2 | -0.64 | 1993 | 1749 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -270 | -150 | 51.6% | +0.31 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.6 | -0.37 |
| 1997 | 1621 | 127.1 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +66 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.3 | +0.82 | 1994 | 1773 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -260 | -181 | 48.5% | -0.08 | 9–6 (60%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.29 |
| 1998 | 1592 | 121.9 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +71 | +3 | 36.8% | -0.87 | 5–7 (42%) | 3–5 (38%) | 98.4 | -1.11 | 1995 | 1788 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -292 | — | 54.1% | +0.31 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.2 | +0.06 |
| 1999 | 1572 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +13 | +1 | 40.9% | -0.94 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–4 (50%) | 98.3 | -0.59 | 1996 | 1666 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -192 | — | 31.6% | -1.28 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.43 |
| 2000 | 1556 | 89.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 | 1997 | 1673 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 52.6% | +0.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.07 |
| Career | 1739 | 130.0 | — | — | — | — | -16 | +20 | -8 | 44.0% | -0.45 | 32–62 (34%) | 28–29 (49%) | 94.0 | +0.13 | Career | 1850 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -251 | -124 | 47.3% | -0.20 | 63–57 (53%) | 39–25 (61%) | 108.6 | +0.74 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 2, 1999 | H2H |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 26, 1998 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 18, 1997 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 21, 1997 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 13, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 10, 1995 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 17, 1996 | H2H |