H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Alexia Dechaume Balleret vs Nancy Feber H2H: 0-1

Nancy Feber holds a 1–0 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nancy Feber leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nancy Feber won the 1996 Wimbledon round of 128 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alexia Dechaume Balleret
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nancy Feber
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nancy Feber #93 6-1 6-1 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Jun 26, 1996* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,738 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,539 0 0 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,491 0 0 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,600 0 0 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,645 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
22 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,710 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,592 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 10 11 21 47.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1997 9 8 17 52.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1998 3 9 12 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 86 145 40.7% 51 67 118 43.2% 10 16 26 38.5% 7 12 19 36.8% — 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1517 105.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01 1992 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.25
17 1987 1539 124.4 — — — — +28 +26 — 42.1% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +1.23 1993 1487 111.8 — — — — +51 — — 26.9% -1.54 1–1 — — -0.06
18 1988 1532 116.8 — — — — — +56 +5 40.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.04 1994 1483 105.3 — — — — -15 — +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
19 1989 1492 117.1 — — — — -9 +59 — 36.4% -1.11 0–6 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 92.8 +0.68 1995 1550 117.2 — — — — -78 — +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.43
20 1990 1601 116.0 — — — — -64 -22 -5 51.7% -0.12 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 108.0 +1.41 1996 1513 113.7 — — — — -89 — +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1991 1645 125.3 — — — — -25 -89 -62 49.3% +0.04 1–8 (11%) 1–1 — -0.53 1997 1516 106.1 — — — — -48 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.12
22 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -43 -63 — 52.2% +0.31 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.1 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 1710 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 1705 133.1 — — — — -51 +24 — 51.9% +0.11 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1995 1585 113.1 — — — — +35 +34 — 22.5% -1.58 1–1 0–2 — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1996 1576 120.4 — — — — +9 +78 — 35.7% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 100.2 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1997 1621 127.1 — — — — +3 +66 — 52.8% -0.01 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.3 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1998 1592 121.9 — — — — -25 +71 +3 36.8% -0.87 5–7 (42%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 1572 115.6 — — — — +3 +13 +1 40.9% -0.94 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.3 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 1556 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1739 130.0 — — — — -16 +20 -8 44.0% -0.45 32–62 (34%) 28–29 (49%) 94.0 +0.13 — 1567 115.2 — — — — -40 — +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.