H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Hummel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1992 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-3 6-1 | Nicole Hummel | Match data | Feb 24, 1992 | R64 | Indian Wells Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,738 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Hummel | — | — | — | 1,500 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Nicole Hummel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Nicole Hummel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 59 | 86 | 145 | 40.7% | 51 | 67 | 118 | 43.2% | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Nicole Hummel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1986 | 1517 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 1539 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | +26 | — | 42.1% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +1.23 | 1992 | 1477 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 18 | 1988 | 1532 | 116.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +56 | +5 | 40.0% | -1.02 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–0 | — | +0.04 | 1993 | 1467 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 19 | 1989 | 1492 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +59 | — | 36.4% | -1.11 | 0–6 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 92.8 | +0.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 1601 | 116.0 | — | — | — | — | -64 | -22 | -5 | 51.7% | -0.12 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–1 (86%) | 108.0 | +1.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 1645 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -89 | -62 | 49.3% | +0.04 | 1–8 (11%) | 1–1 | — | -0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 1733 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | -43 | -63 | — | 52.2% | +0.31 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.1 | -0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 1710 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 1705 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +24 | — | 51.9% | +0.11 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 1585 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | +34 | — | 22.5% | -1.58 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 1576 | 120.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +78 | — | 35.7% | -1.19 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.2 | -0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 1621 | 127.1 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +66 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.3 | +0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 1592 | 121.9 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +71 | +3 | 36.8% | -0.87 | 5–7 (42%) | 3–5 (38%) | 98.4 | -1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 1572 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +13 | +1 | 40.9% | -0.94 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–4 (50%) | 98.3 | -0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 1556 | 89.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1739 | 130.0 | — | — | — | — | -16 | +20 | -8 | 44.0% | -0.45 | 32–62 (34%) | 28–29 (49%) | 94.0 | +0.13 | — | 1500 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.33 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 2, 1999 | H2H |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 26, 1998 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 18, 1997 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 21, 1997 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 13, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federica Bonsignori | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 7, 1993 | H2H |
| Kristin Godridge | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 14, 1992 | H2H |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 24, 1992 | H2H |