H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Alexia Dechaume Balleret vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 0-1

Nicole Jagerman holds a 1–0 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Jagerman won the 1995 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alexia Dechaume Balleret
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Jagerman
NED Age 59 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Jagerman #146 6-4 6-2 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Mar 18, 1995* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,738 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Jagerman #685 #43 24 1,735 81 100 44.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Nicole Jagerman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0 1986 9–4 69.2% #106 1,606 0 0
19 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,491 0 0 1987 0–10 0.0% #206 1,479 0 0
20 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,600 0 0 1988 11–10 52.4% #72 1,582 0 0
21 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,645 0 0 1989 13–15 46.4% #82 1,658 0 0
22 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,733 0 0 1990 12–13 48.0% #68 1,698 0 0
23 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,710 0 0 1991 10–11 47.6% #67 1,690 0 0
24 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0 1992 9–14 39.1% #115 1,632 0 0
25 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0 1993 12–11 52.2% #68 1,682 0 0
26 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,576 0 0 1994 4–11 26.7% #137 1,590 0 0
27 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,620 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #215 1,608 0 0
28 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,592 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Nicole Jagerman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1986 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
20 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 5 4 9 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1991 10 11 21 47.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1997 9 8 17 52.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1998 3 9 12 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 86 145 40.7% 51 67 118 43.2% 10 16 26 38.5% 7 12 19 36.8% — 21 32 53 39.6% 54 51 105 51.4% 2 10 12 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alexia Dechaume Balleret Nicole Jagerman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1517 105.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1539 124.4 — — — — +28 +26 — 42.1% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1532 116.8 — — — — — +56 +5 40.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.04 1986 1607 116.3 — — — — 0 +33 — 63.3% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 106.5 +1.74
19 1989 1492 117.1 — — — — -9 +59 — 36.4% -1.11 0–6 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 92.8 +0.68 1987 1480 96.7 — — — — — +55 +35 9.1% -2.55 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.44
20 1990 1601 116.0 — — — — -64 -22 -5 51.7% -0.12 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 108.0 +1.41 1988 1582 121.0 — — — — +4 +31 — 50.0% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 4–1 (80%) 106.2 +0.50
21 1991 1645 125.3 — — — — -25 -89 -62 49.3% +0.04 1–8 (11%) 1–1 — -0.53 1989 1659 133.0 — — — — -114 +87 — 45.5% -0.17 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 104.0 +0.22
22 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -43 -63 — 52.2% +0.31 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.1 -0.96 1990 1698 130.7 — — — — -75 +4 — 49.1% -0.57 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — -1.74
23 1993 1710 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00 1991 1691 126.0 — — — — — +73 -152 42.2% -0.56 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.09
24 1994 1705 133.1 — — — — -51 +24 — 51.9% +0.11 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.41 1992 1632 128.5 — — — — -36 +72 — 42.0% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 97.4 -0.22
25 1995 1585 113.1 — — — — +35 +34 — 22.5% -1.58 1–1 0–2 — -0.50 1993 1683 131.2 — — — — -33 +15 — 51.0% +0.12 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 +0.14
26 1996 1576 120.4 — — — — +9 +78 — 35.7% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 100.2 -0.64 1994 1590 112.1 — — — — +10 +71 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.31
27 1997 1621 127.1 — — — — +3 +66 — 52.8% -0.01 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.3 +0.82 1995 1608 114.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.38
28 1998 1592 121.9 — — — — -25 +71 +3 36.8% -0.87 5–7 (42%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 1572 115.6 — — — — +3 +13 +1 40.9% -0.94 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.3 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 1556 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1739 130.0 — — — — -16 +20 -8 44.0% -0.45 32–62 (34%) 28–29 (49%) 94.0 +0.13 — 1736 132.3 — — — — -41 +52 -59 44.5% -0.39 21–21 (50%) 23–15 (61%) 107.3 -0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.