H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Alicia Molik vs Amy Frazier H2H: 3-2

Alicia Molik holds a 3–2 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Alicia Molik leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2004 San Diego fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alicia Molik
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 30, 2004* San Diego WTA 1000 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #25 3-6 6-3 6-4 Alicia Molik #29 Match data
Mar 26, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Alicia Molik #30 4-6 7-5 6-2 Amy Frazier #44 Match data
Jan 12, 2003* Hobart WTA 250 F Hard Alicia Molik #96 6-2 4-6 6-4 Amy Frazier #42 Match data
May 23, 2002* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Alicia Molik #53 6-4 6-3 Amy Frazier #60 Match data
Jun 29, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Amy Frazier #25 4-6 7-5 6-4 Alicia Molik #130 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,035 151 161 48.4% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alicia Molik Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 2000 6–10 37.5% #115 1,552 0 0 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 2004 37–18 67.3% #13 1,938 0 4 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,779 0 5 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,632 0 5 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,628 0 5 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2008 1–5 16.7% #308 1,577 0 5 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 — — — — — — — 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,561 0 5 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,584 0 5 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8