H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alicia Molik vs Cristina Torrens Valero H2H: 1-0

Alicia Molik holds a 1–0 lead over Cristina Torrens Valero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alicia Molik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2002 Toyota Princess Cup round of 32 6-4 6-2.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alicia Molik #94 6-4 6-2 Cristina Torrens Valero #76 Match data Sep 19, 2002* R32 Toyota Princess Cup Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,060 156 164 48.8% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Cristina Torrens Valero #1,073 #27 955 1,786 117 153 43.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alicia Molik Cristina Torrens Valero
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% #189 1,483 0 0
19 2000 6–11 35.3% #115 1,544 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,488 0 0
20 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0 1995 1–4 20.0% #183 1,466 0 0
21 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0 1996 4–4 50.0% #95 1,507 0 0
22 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1 1997 12–17 41.4% #86 1,569 0 0
23 2004 42–19 68.9% #13 1,977 0 4 1998 11–20 35.5% #97 1,525 0 0
24 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,796 0 5 1999 21–14 60.0% #52 1,654 0 1
25 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,640 0 5 2000 14–20 41.2% #93 1,603 0 1
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,636 0 5 2001 30–24 55.6% #32 1,658 0 2
27 2008 1–6 14.3% #308 1,567 0 5 2002 15–28 34.9% #79 1,535 0 2
28 2003 7–17 29.2% #109 1,455 0 2
29 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,557 0 5 2004 0–1 0.0% #418 1,452 0 2
30 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,582 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alicia Molik Cristina Torrens Valero
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2003 15 10 25 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 0 5 5 0.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2004 32 10 42 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2006 3 9 12 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2008 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2002 3 10 13 23.1% 10 13 23 43.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2011 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 115 106 221 52.0% 24 33 57 42.1% 17 22 39 43.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 20 51 71 28.2% 89 81 170 52.4% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 8 9 11.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 89/224 of Alicia Molik's and 4/25 of Cristina Torrens Valero's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alicia Molik Cristina Torrens Valero
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2003 7/41 6.3 3.9 53.4% 74.6% 47.7% 72.3% 36.5% 62.3% 37.6% —/—
23 2004 7/61 5.3 1.9 58.4% 68.2% 56.2% 50.7% 54.6% 63.4% 45.6% —/—
24 2005 8/31 7.3 2.8 60.1% 72.0% 49.5% 63.8% 34.9% 63.1% 37.2% —/—
25 2006 9/20 5.2 2.7 60.9% 56.7% 43.2% 48.0% 27.4% 51.0% 35.2% —/—
26 2007 30/40 6.1 2.7 63.5% 66.5% 44.5% 56.3% 41.8% 58.7% 36.5% —/—
27 2008 6/7 5.3 3.2 56.4% 63.3% 43.4% 57.3% 69.5% 54.6% 35.1% —/—
28 —/— 2003 3/24 2.3 5.3 63.7% 47.2% 39.2% 33.4% 21.9% 44.0% 33.4%
29 2010 18/20 4.0 3.7 60.6% 60.4% 45.8% 56.5% 51.9% 54.8% 39.6% 2004 1/1 1.0 3.0 58.9% 45.5% 60.9% 33.3% 14.3% 51.8% 31.3%
30 2011 4/4 2.3 2.5 58.7% 56.1% 45.4% 40.6% 43.1% 51.6% 35.1% —/—
Career 89/320 5.4 2.9 60.5% 64.9% 46.2% 56.3% 44.3% 57.6% 37.7% 4/270 2.0 4.8 62.5% 46.8% 44.6% 33.4% 20.0% 46.0% 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alicia Molik Cristina Torrens Valero
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1538 124.1 +1 +32 +39 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) -0.37 1993 1484 96.4 42.9% -1.00 0–1 +0.48
19 2000 1545 115.2 +14 -19 +28 40.5% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.44 1994 1488 102.7 37.5% -1.00 1–1 -0.07
20 2001 1614 121.4 -29 -100 +81 50.0% -0.26 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 106.1 +0.43 1995 1466 95.5 +88 27.3% -1.73 0–1 0–2 +0.10
21 2002 1569 124.5 -14 -45 40.9% -0.48 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.3 -1.20 1996 1507 106.5 +54 47.6% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 2–0 +0.21
22 2003 1706 136.1 +3.00 -2.49 0.999 50.8% -34 -56 -42 59.1% +0.82 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.1 -0.67 1997 1570 113.1 -119 +81 +41 41.8% -0.64 7–4 (64%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 +0.88
23 2004 1978 154.9 +4.02 +1.09 1.244 53.8% -4 -279 -302 66.4% +1.05 9–9 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 104.1 -3.21 1998 1525 114.3 -55 +75 +43 38.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.9 +0.55
24 2005 1796 147.3 +4.13 -2.25 1.007 50.9% +36 55.9% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 98.0 -0.03 1999 1654 124.5 -208 +105 57.5% +0.31 6–4 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.5 +0.58
25 2006 1641 108.0 -1.66 -3.77 0.719 43.4% +48 +8 -24 33.3% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -0.84 2000 1603 119.2 -154 +69 -41 44.4% -0.70 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.0 -0.86
26 2007 1636 131.0 +2.14 -5.78 0.884 47.8% +52 -31 -15 45.5% -0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.9 -1.11 2001 1659 124.6 -200 +196 -99 55.9% +0.24 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.6 +1.71
27 2008 1568 101.1 -1.44 -2.86 0.773 45.3% +84 -29 14.3% -2.36 1–2 (33%) -0.12 2002 1535 116.8 -94 +132 -5 35.4% -1.02 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 100.2 +1.30
28 2003 1456 99.6 -3.14 -2.73 0.596 38.6% +7 +62 36.2% -1.22 5–7 (42%) 4–0 (100%) 101.9 +0.49
29 2010 1557 118.1 -1.04 -3.67 0.876 47.8% +57 +39 41.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.8 +0.44 2004 1452 103.7 -1.17 -0.05 0.650 40.7% 0.0% -3.50 -0.14
30 2011 1582 106.7 -1.46 -2.46 0.726 43.7% +48 44.4% -1.44 1–0 -0.33
Career 2061 138.9 +1.10 -3.69 0.889 48.0% +13 -83 -42 49.9% -0.02 46–53 (46%) 40–40 (50%) 99.4 -2.34 1786 119.3 -2.65 -2.06 0.608 39.1% -116 +111 -3 44.7% -0.51 42–43 (49%) 36–27 (57%) 105.5 +1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.