H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Cristina Torrens Valero H2H: 1-0
Alicia Molik holds a 1–0 lead over Cristina Torrens Valero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alicia Molik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2002 Tokyo third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2002* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alicia Molik | 6-4 6-2 | Cristina Torrens Valero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Cristina Torrens Valero | #1,073 | #27 | 955 | 1,787 | 117 | 153 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Cristina Torrens Valero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #183 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #97 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #79 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #109 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |