H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Alicia Molik vs Dawn Buth H2H: 1-0

Alicia Molik holds a 1–0 lead over Dawn Buth in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alicia Molik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2001 Birmingham round of 64 6-2 7-5.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alicia Molik #92 6-2 7-5 Dawn Buth #108 Match data Jun 13, 2001* R64 Birmingham Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,060 156 164 48.8% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Dawn Buth #687 #96 354 1,516 2 8 20.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alicia Molik Dawn Buth
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0
19 2000 6–11 35.3% #115 1,544 0 0
20 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0
21 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0
22 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1
23 2004 42–19 68.9% #13 1,977 0 4
24 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,796 0 5 2000 1–1 50.0% #121 1,498 0 0
25 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,640 0 5 2001 1–7 12.5% #186 1,449 0 0
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,636 0 5
27 2008 1–6 14.3% #308 1,567 0 5
29 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,557 0 5
30 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,582 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alicia Molik Dawn Buth
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2003 15 10 25 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2004 32 10 42 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2006 3 9 12 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2008 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2011 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 115 106 221 52.0% 24 33 57 42.1% 17 22 39 43.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alicia Molik Dawn Buth
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1538 124.1 +1 +32 +39 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) -0.37
19 2000 1545 115.2 +14 -19 +28 40.5% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.44
20 2001 1614 121.4 -29 -100 +81 50.0% -0.26 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 106.1 +0.43
21 2002 1569 124.5 -14 -45 40.9% -0.48 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.3 -1.20
22 2003 1706 136.1 +3.00 -2.49 0.999 50.8% -34 -56 -42 59.1% +0.82 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.1 -0.67
23 2004 1978 154.9 +4.02 +1.09 1.244 53.8% -4 -279 -302 66.4% +1.05 9–9 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 104.1 -3.21
24 2005 1796 147.3 +4.13 -2.25 1.007 50.9% +36 55.9% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 98.0 -0.03 2000 1499 98.4 50.0% -0.75 1–0 +0.51
25 2006 1641 108.0 -1.66 -3.77 0.719 43.4% +48 +8 -24 33.3% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -0.84 2001 1449 100.5 +80 +44 22.2% -2.17 0–2 -0.29
26 2007 1636 131.0 +2.14 -5.78 0.884 47.8% +52 -31 -15 45.5% -0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.9 -1.11
27 2008 1568 101.1 -1.44 -2.86 0.773 45.3% +84 -29 14.3% -2.36 1–2 (33%) -0.12
29 2010 1557 118.1 -1.04 -3.67 0.876 47.8% +57 +39 41.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.8 +0.44
30 2011 1582 106.7 -1.46 -2.46 0.726 43.7% +48 44.4% -1.44 1–0 -0.33
Career 2061 138.9 +1.10 -3.69 0.889 48.0% +13 -83 -42 49.9% -0.02 46–53 (46%) 40–40 (50%) 99.4 -2.34 1516 99.7 +80 +44 27.3% -1.91 0–2 1–0 +2.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.