H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Henrieta Nagyova H2H: 0-1
Henrieta Nagyova holds a 1–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henrieta Nagyova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henrieta Nagyova won the 2004 Estoril third round 3-6 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 47
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2004* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Henrieta Nagyova | 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Henrieta Nagyova | #723 | #21 | 1,277 | 1,942 | 200 | 171 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Henrieta Nagyova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #37 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #28 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #32 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,796 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,626 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #153 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,568 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |