H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Alicia Molik vs Joannette Kruger H2H: 0-1

Joannette Kruger holds a 1–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joannette Kruger leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joannette Kruger won the 2001 Toyota Princess Cup round of 32 7-5 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alicia Molik
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Joannette Kruger
RSA Age 53 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joannette Kruger #58 7-5 3-6 6-2 Alicia Molik #61 Match data Sep 20, 2001* R32 Toyota Princess Cup Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,060 156 164 48.8% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Joannette Kruger #972 #21 1,280 1,860 147 163 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alicia Molik Joannette Kruger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0 1992 2–3 40.0% #96 1,508 0 0
19 2000 6–11 35.3% #115 1,544 0 0 1993 9–13 40.9% #128 1,576 0 0
20 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0 1994 13–17 43.3% #79 1,639 0 0
21 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0 1995 19–15 55.9% #30 1,726 0 1
22 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1 1996 7–13 35.0% #126 1,625 0 1
23 2004 42–19 68.9% #13 1,977 0 4 1997 25–18 58.1% #27 1,785 0 2
24 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,796 0 5 1998 25–22 53.2% #30 1,713 0 2
25 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,640 0 5 1999 9–13 40.9% #129 1,646 0 2
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,636 0 5 2000 16–17 48.5% #59 1,657 0 2
27 2008 1–6 14.3% #308 1,567 0 5 2001 21–23 47.7% #46 1,643 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2002 1–4 20.0% #455 1,591 0 2
29 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,557 0 5 2003 0–5 0.0% #853 1,531 0 2
30 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,582 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alicia Molik Joannette Kruger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2003 15 10 25 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2004 32 10 42 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 4 3 7 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 18 11 29 62.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2006 3 9 12 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2000 7 7 14 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2008 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 16 12 28 57.1% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2011 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 106 221 52.0% 24 33 57 42.1% 17 22 39 43.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — 70 67 137 51.1% 62 64 126 49.2% 7 14 21 33.3% 8 18 26 30.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 89/224 of Alicia Molik's and 1/5 of Joannette Kruger's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alicia Molik Joannette Kruger
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2003 7/41 6.3 3.9 53.4% 74.6% 47.7% 72.3% 36.5% 62.3% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 7/61 5.3 1.9 58.4% 68.2% 56.2% 50.7% 54.6% 63.4% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 8/31 7.3 2.8 60.1% 72.0% 49.5% 63.8% 34.9% 63.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 9/20 5.2 2.7 60.9% 56.7% 43.2% 48.0% 27.4% 51.0% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 30/40 6.1 2.7 63.5% 66.5% 44.5% 56.3% 41.8% 58.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 6/7 5.3 3.2 56.4% 63.3% 43.4% 57.3% 69.5% 54.6% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 18/20 4.0 3.7 60.6% 60.4% 45.8% 56.5% 51.9% 54.8% 39.6% 2003 1/5 0.0 5.0 68.1% 40.6% 13.3% 33.3% 75.0% 31.9% 45.8%
30 2011 4/4 2.3 2.5 58.7% 56.1% 45.4% 40.6% 43.1% 51.6% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 89/320 5.4 2.9 60.5% 64.9% 46.2% 56.3% 44.3% 57.6% 37.7% — 1/310 0.0 5.0 68.1% 40.6% 13.3% 33.3% 75.0% 31.9% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alicia Molik Joannette Kruger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1538 124.1 — — — — +1 +32 +39 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) — — -0.37 1992 1508 108.6 — — — — — +78 — 41.7% -1.00 1–1 1–1 — 0.00
19 2000 1545 115.2 — — — — +14 -19 +28 40.5% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.44 1993 1576 111.5 — — — — -64 +57 +8 38.5% -0.98 6–2 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 103.1 -0.32
20 2001 1614 121.4 — — — — -29 -100 +81 50.0% -0.26 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 106.1 +0.43 1994 1640 139.3 — — — — -110 +86 -11 44.1% -0.47 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 -0.48
21 2002 1569 124.5 — — — — -14 -45 — 40.9% -0.48 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.3 -1.20 1995 1726 133.4 — — — — -64 +26 — 54.5% +0.18 5–4 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 101.5 +0.79
22 2003 1706 136.1 +3.00 -2.49 0.999 50.8% -34 -56 -42 59.1% +0.82 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.1 -0.67 1996 1625 111.8 — — — — -5 +66 — 36.6% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 103.7 -0.38
23 2004 1978 154.9 +4.02 +1.09 1.244 53.8% -4 -279 -302 66.4% +1.05 9–9 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 104.1 -3.21 1997 1786 143.0 — — — — -78 +29 — 53.0% +0.10 11–3 (79%) 6–4 (60%) 109.9 -0.97
24 2005 1796 147.3 +4.13 -2.25 1.007 50.9% +36 — — 55.9% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 98.0 -0.03 1998 1714 137.8 — — — — +52 +7 — 50.0% -0.24 9–5 (64%) 4–6 (40%) 101.8 +0.70
25 2006 1641 108.0 -1.66 -3.77 0.719 43.4% +48 +8 -24 33.3% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -0.84 1999 1647 113.5 — — — — +68 +11 — 39.6% -0.53 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.5 -0.09
26 2007 1636 131.0 +2.14 -5.78 0.884 47.8% +52 -31 -15 45.5% -0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.9 -1.11 2000 1658 124.8 — — — — +24 -4 — 50.0% -0.01 6–8 (43%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.73
27 2008 1568 101.1 -1.44 -2.86 0.773 45.3% +84 -29 — 14.3% -2.36 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.12 2001 1644 115.3 — — — — +38 -79 -127 44.1% -0.64 11–5 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 +0.58
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1591 105.0 — — — — +36 — — 30.8% -1.23 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.01
29 2010 1557 118.1 -1.04 -3.67 0.876 47.8% +57 — +39 41.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.8 +0.44 2003 1532 103.1 -1.38 +1.09 0.673 38.9% — -5 — 16.7% -2.50 0–2 — — -0.40
30 2011 1582 106.7 -1.46 -2.46 0.726 43.7% +48 — — 44.4% -1.44 1–0 — — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2061 138.9 +1.10 -3.69 0.889 48.0% +13 -83 -42 49.9% -0.02 46–53 (46%) 40–40 (50%) 99.4 -2.34 — 1861 132.9 -1.38 +1.09 0.673 38.9% -3 +20 -33 46.1% -0.41 64–42 (60%) 39–40 (49%) 103.4 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.