H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Laura Granville H2H: 0-1
Laura Granville holds a 1–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Granville leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Granville won the 2005 Birmingham third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Laura Granville | 6-4 6-2 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Laura Granville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |