H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alicia Molik vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 1-0

Alicia Molik holds a 1–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alicia Molik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2006 Guangzhou Open round of 16 7-6(3) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alicia Molik
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alicia Molik #215 7-6(3) 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #43 Match data Sep 29, 2006* R16 Guangzhou Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,060 156 164 48.8% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alicia Molik Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 6–11 35.3% #115 1,544 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2004 42–19 68.9% #13 1,977 0 4 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,796 0 5 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,640 0 5 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,636 0 5 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2008 1–6 14.3% #308 1,567 0 5 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,557 0 5 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,582 0 5 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alicia Molik Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2003 15 10 25 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2004 32 10 42 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 3 9 12 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2008 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2011 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 106 221 52.0% 24 33 57 42.1% 17 22 39 43.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alicia Molik Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1538 124.1 — — — — +1 +32 +39 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) — — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1545 115.2 — — — — +14 -19 +28 40.5% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.44 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2001 1614 121.4 — — — — -29 -100 +81 50.0% -0.26 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 106.1 +0.43 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2002 1569 124.5 — — — — -14 -45 — 40.9% -0.48 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.3 -1.20 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2003 1706 136.1 +3.00 -2.49 0.999 50.8% -34 -56 -42 59.1% +0.82 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.1 -0.67 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2004 1978 154.9 +4.02 +1.09 1.244 53.8% -4 -279 -302 66.4% +1.05 9–9 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 104.1 -3.21 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2005 1796 147.3 +4.13 -2.25 1.007 50.9% +36 — — 55.9% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 98.0 -0.03 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2006 1641 108.0 -1.66 -3.77 0.719 43.4% +48 +8 -24 33.3% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -0.84 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2007 1636 131.0 +2.14 -5.78 0.884 47.8% +52 -31 -15 45.5% -0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.9 -1.11 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2008 1568 101.1 -1.44 -2.86 0.773 45.3% +84 -29 — 14.3% -2.36 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.12 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2010 1557 118.1 -1.04 -3.67 0.876 47.8% +57 — +39 41.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.8 +0.44 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2011 1582 106.7 -1.46 -2.46 0.726 43.7% +48 — — 44.4% -1.44 1–0 — — -0.33 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 2061 138.9 +1.10 -3.69 0.889 48.0% +13 -83 -42 49.9% -0.02 46–53 (46%) 40–40 (50%) 99.4 -2.34 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.