H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Martina Sucha H2H: 3-0
Alicia Molik holds a 3–0 lead over Martina Sucha in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alicia Molik leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2004 Vienna third round 7-5 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2004* | Vienna | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Alicia Molik | 7-5 7-6(4) | Martina Sucha | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2003* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Alicia Molik | 6-1 6-0 | Martina Sucha | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2003* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Alicia Molik | 6-1 6-2 | Martina Sucha | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Martina Sucha | #948 | #37 | 859 | 1,730 | 96 | 125 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Martina Sucha | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #65 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #93 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #83 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |