H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 1-2
Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 2–1 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2004 Doha third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2004* | Doha | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-4 6-3 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2002* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-4 6-4 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2001* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alicia Molik | 6-1 7-6(1) | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |