H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-2
Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Doha semifinal 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2002* | Doha | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2001* | Shanghai | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-1 6-0 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 |
| 23 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |