H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 0-3
Nathalie Dechy holds a 3–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2005 Filderstadt third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2005* | Filderstadt | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 6-3 6-3 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
| May 30, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Nathalie Dechy | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2000* | Oklahoma | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Nathalie Dechy | 7-5 6-0 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Nathalie Dechy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |