H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alicia Molik vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 3-0

Alicia Molik holds a 3–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alicia Molik leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2005 Miami Open round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alicia Molik
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alicia Molik #8 6-2 6-3 Nicole Pratt #93 Match data Mar 25, 2005* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Alicia Molik #9 6-3 6-2 Nicole Pratt #91 Match data Feb 25, 2005* R16 Qatar Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Alicia Molik #29 6-3 6-4 Nicole Pratt #37 Match data Jul 28, 2004* R64 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,060 156 164 48.8% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alicia Molik Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 2000 6–11 35.3% #115 1,544 0 0 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2004 42–19 68.9% #13 1,977 0 4 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,796 0 5 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,640 0 5 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,636 0 5 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2008 1–6 14.3% #308 1,567 0 5 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,557 0 5 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,582 0 5 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alicia Molik Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2003 15 10 25 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2004 32 10 42 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2006 3 9 12 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2008 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2011 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 106 221 52.0% 24 33 57 42.1% 17 22 39 43.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 89/224 of Alicia Molik's and 48/157 of Nicole Pratt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alicia Molik Nicole Pratt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2003 7/41 6.3 3.9 53.4% 74.6% 47.7% 72.3% 36.5% 62.3% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 7/61 5.3 1.9 58.4% 68.2% 56.2% 50.7% 54.6% 63.4% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 8/31 7.3 2.8 60.1% 72.0% 49.5% 63.8% 34.9% 63.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 9/20 5.2 2.7 60.9% 56.7% 43.2% 48.0% 27.4% 51.0% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 30/40 6.1 2.7 63.5% 66.5% 44.5% 56.3% 41.8% 58.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 6/7 5.3 3.2 56.4% 63.3% 43.4% 57.3% 69.5% 54.6% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 18/20 4.0 3.7 60.6% 60.4% 45.8% 56.5% 51.9% 54.8% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 4/4 2.3 2.5 58.7% 56.1% 45.4% 40.6% 43.1% 51.6% 35.1% 2003 5/40 0.2 4.4 66.1% 58.7% 43.7% 50.3% 59.6% 53.4% 44.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 6/43 0.2 4.2 65.0% 59.4% 44.8% 55.7% 43.2% 54.1% 41.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/25 0.8 5.2 59.5% 65.7% 44.6% 56.6% 40.1% 57.3% 44.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 8/20 0.5 2.1 70.5% 55.5% 41.2% 46.6% 36.4% 51.0% 39.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/26 1.0 2.3 68.4% 57.3% 43.1% 36.6% 53.8% 53.1% 41.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 0.0 2.7 71.0% 48.8% 32.7% 31.1% 30.0% 44.7% 35.8%
Career — 89/320 5.4 2.9 60.5% 64.9% 46.2% 56.3% 44.3% 57.6% 37.7% — 48/378 0.6 3.1 67.3% 57.8% 42.6% 43.8% 47.3% 52.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alicia Molik Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 1999 1538 124.1 — — — — +1 +32 +39 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) — — -0.37 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 2000 1545 115.2 — — — — +14 -19 +28 40.5% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.44 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 2001 1614 121.4 — — — — -29 -100 +81 50.0% -0.26 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 106.1 +0.43 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 2002 1569 124.5 — — — — -14 -45 — 40.9% -0.48 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.3 -1.20 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 2003 1706 136.1 +3.00 -2.49 0.999 50.8% -34 -56 -42 59.1% +0.82 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.1 -0.67 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 2004 1978 154.9 +4.02 +1.09 1.244 53.8% -4 -279 -302 66.4% +1.05 9–9 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 104.1 -3.21 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 2005 1796 147.3 +4.13 -2.25 1.007 50.9% +36 — — 55.9% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 98.0 -0.03 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 2006 1641 108.0 -1.66 -3.77 0.719 43.4% +48 +8 -24 33.3% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -0.84 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 2007 1636 131.0 +2.14 -5.78 0.884 47.8% +52 -31 -15 45.5% -0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.9 -1.11 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 2008 1568 101.1 -1.44 -2.86 0.773 45.3% +84 -29 — 14.3% -2.36 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.12 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 2010 1557 118.1 -1.04 -3.67 0.876 47.8% +57 — +39 41.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.8 +0.44 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 2011 1582 106.7 -1.46 -2.46 0.726 43.7% +48 — — 44.4% -1.44 1–0 — — -0.33 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 2061 138.9 +1.10 -3.69 0.889 48.0% +13 -83 -42 49.9% -0.02 46–53 (46%) 40–40 (50%) 99.4 -2.34 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.