H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Alicia Molik vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–1 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2004 Wimbledon round of 32 6-2 6-4.

AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamarine Tanasugarn #66 6-2 6-4 Alicia Molik #26 Match data Jun 27, 2004* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tamarine Tanasugarn #27 6-4 1-6 6-1 Alicia Molik #89 Match data Oct 5, 2002* QF Japan Women's Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Alicia Molik #59 6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #24 Match data Oct 12, 2001* R16 Shanghai Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,060 156 164 48.8% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alicia Molik Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 2000 6–11 35.3% #115 1,544 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 2004 42–19 68.9% #13 1,977 0 4 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,796 0 5 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,640 0 5 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,636 0 5 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2008 1–6 14.3% #308 1,567 0 5 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,557 0 5 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,582 0 5 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alicia Molik Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1994 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 2 5 7 28.6%
19 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2003 15 10 25 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 2004 32 10 42 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 2006 3 9 12 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2008 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2011 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
32 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
34 2011 3 9 12 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
38 2015 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 115 106 221 52.0% 24 33 57 42.1% 17 22 39 43.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 89/224 of Alicia Molik's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alicia Molik Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2003 7/41 6.3 3.9 53.4% 74.6% 47.7% 72.3% 36.5% 62.3% 37.6% —/—
23 2004 7/61 5.3 1.9 58.4% 68.2% 56.2% 50.7% 54.6% 63.4% 45.6% —/—
24 2005 8/31 7.3 2.8 60.1% 72.0% 49.5% 63.8% 34.9% 63.1% 37.2% —/—
25 2006 9/20 5.2 2.7 60.9% 56.7% 43.2% 48.0% 27.4% 51.0% 35.2% —/—
26 2007 30/40 6.1 2.7 63.5% 66.5% 44.5% 56.3% 41.8% 58.7% 36.5% 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 2008 6/7 5.3 3.2 56.4% 63.3% 43.4% 57.3% 69.5% 54.6% 35.1% 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 —/— 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 2010 18/20 4.0 3.7 60.6% 60.4% 45.8% 56.5% 51.9% 54.8% 39.6% 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 2011 4/4 2.3 2.5 58.7% 56.1% 45.4% 40.6% 43.1% 51.6% 35.1% 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 —/— 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 —/— 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 —/— 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 —/— 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 —/— 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
38 —/— 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career 89/320 5.4 2.9 60.5% 64.9% 46.2% 56.3% 44.3% 57.6% 37.7% 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alicia Molik Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1993 1483 96.2 0.0% -1.50 0–1 +0.17
17 1994 1493 103.5 50.0% -0.83 1–1 +0.06
18 1999 1538 124.1 +1 +32 +39 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) -0.37 1995 1479 101.3 +23 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) +0.28
19 2000 1545 115.2 +14 -19 +28 40.5% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) -0.44 1996 1610 124.2 +2 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) +0.66
20 2001 1614 121.4 -29 -100 +81 50.0% -0.26 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) +0.43 1997 1648 125.4 -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) +1.65
21 2002 1569 124.5 -14 -45 40.9% -0.48 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) -1.20 1998 1702 138.7 +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) +1.91
22 2003 1706 136.1 +3.00 -2.49 0.999 50.8% -34 -56 -42 59.1% +0.82 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) -0.67 1999 1634 113.0 -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) +0.52
23 2004 1978 154.9 +4.02 +1.09 1.244 53.8% -4 -279 -302 66.4% +1.05 9–9 (50%) 8–6 (57%) -3.21 2000 1792 139.5 -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) -1.30
24 2005 1796 147.3 +4.13 -2.25 1.007 50.9% +36 55.9% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) -0.03 2001 1698 135.6 +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) +2.28
25 2006 1641 108.0 -1.66 -3.77 0.719 43.4% +48 +8 -24 33.3% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) -0.84 2002 1677 130.8 +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) +2.48
26 2007 1636 131.0 +2.14 -5.78 0.884 47.8% +52 -31 -15 45.5% -0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) -1.11 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) +0.78
27 2008 1568 101.1 -1.44 -2.86 0.773 45.3% +84 -29 14.3% -2.36 1–2 (33%) -0.12 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) +1.55
28 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.91
29 2010 1557 118.1 -1.04 -3.67 0.876 47.8% +57 +39 41.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) +0.44 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) +0.99
30 2011 1582 106.7 -1.46 -2.46 0.726 43.7% +48 44.4% -1.44 1–0 -0.33 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) -2.05
31 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) -1.05
32 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) -0.13
33 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) -0.51
34 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 28.6% -1.57 -0.69
35 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 -0.01
38 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% 0.0% -3.50 0–1 +0.05
Career 2061 138.9 +1.10 -3.69 0.889 48.0% +13 -83 -42 49.9% -0.02 46–53 (46%) 40–40 (50%) 99.4 -2.34 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.