H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Alicia Molik vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–1 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2004 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alicia Molik
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #66 6-2 6-4 Alicia Molik #26 Match data
Oct 5, 2002* Japan Open WTA 250 QF Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #27 6-4 1-6 6-1 Alicia Molik #89 Match data
Oct 12, 2001* Shanghai WTA 250 R16 Hard Alicia Molik #59 6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,035 151 161 48.4% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alicia Molik Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 2000 6–10 37.5% #115 1,552 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2004 37–18 67.3% #13 1,938 0 4 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,779 0 5 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,632 0 5 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,628 0 5 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2008 1–5 16.7% #308 1,577 0 5 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,561 0 5 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,584 0 5 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4