H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-2
Tamira Paszek holds a 2–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2007 Miami first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2007* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tamira Paszek | 6-3 6-4 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
| May 25, 2006* | Istanbul | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Tamira Paszek | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alicia Molik | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |