H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alicia Molik vs Yoon Jeong Cho H2H: 1-1
Alicia Molik and Yoon Jeong Cho are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2001 Shanghai quarterfinal 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2001* | Shanghai | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Alicia Molik | 7-5 7-5 | Yoon Jeong Cho | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2001* | Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yoon Jeong Cho | 6-4 6-7(3) 7-5 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Yoon Jeong Cho | #1,416 | #45 | 740 | 1,704 | 45 | 58 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Alicia Molik | Yoon Jeong Cho | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1416 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |