H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alina Jidkova vs Laura Granville H2H: 1-2
Laura Granville holds a 2–1 lead over Alina Jidkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Granville leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Granville won the 2004 Tokyo third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2004* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Laura Granville | 7-5 6-2 | Alina Jidkova | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Laura Granville | 6-1 6-4 | Alina Jidkova | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alina Jidkova | 2-6 6-4 6-0 | Laura Granville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alina Jidkova | #613 | #51 | 648 | 1,611 | 47 | 112 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alina Jidkova | Laura Granville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #79 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #85 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #97 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #55 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–25 | 21.9% | #124 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #335 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,413 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,386 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,374 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |