H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alina Jidkova vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 1-0
Alina Jidkova holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alina Jidkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alina Jidkova won the 2003 Indian Wells first round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Alina Jidkova | 7-5 6-1 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alina Jidkova | #613 | #51 | 648 | 1,611 | 47 | 112 | 29.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alina Jidkova | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #79 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #85 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #97 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #55 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–25 | 21.9% | #124 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #335 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,413 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,386 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,374 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |