H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Alina Jidkova vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 0-3

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 3–0 lead over Alina Jidkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2004 Birmingham second round 1-6 7-6(2) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alina Jidkova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 9, 2004* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #58 1-6 7-6(2) 6-2 Alina Jidkova #76 Match data
Jan 17, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #32 6-2 3-6 6-3 Alina Jidkova #101 Match data
Mar 21, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #62 6-3 6-3 Alina Jidkova #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alina Jidkova #613 #51 648 1,611 47 112 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alina Jidkova Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2000 3–15 16.7% #79 1,425 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2001 3–6 33.3% #114 1,464 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2002 8–15 34.8% #85 1,478 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #97 1,507 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2004 16–22 42.1% #55 1,592 0 0 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2005 7–25 21.9% #124 1,458 0 0 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2006 1–4 20.0% #335 1,437 0 0 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2007 2–8 20.0% #148 1,413 0 0 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2008 0–3 0.0% #242 1,386 0 0 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #336 1,374 0 0 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4