H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Elena Vesnina H2H: 1-2
Elena Vesnina holds a 2–1 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elena Vesnina leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Vesnina won the 2017 Toronto second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2017* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elena Vesnina | 6-3 6-3 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2014* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elena Vesnina | 6-2 6-2 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 6-2 6-2 | Elena Vesnina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Elena Vesnina | #573 | #13 | 3,320 | 1,858 | 262 | 260 | 50.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Elena Vesnina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #47 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #54 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #79 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #23 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #57 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #64 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #115 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #16 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #18 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #137 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #310 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |