H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 1-0
Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 1–0 lead over Flavia Pennetta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2014 New Haven fourth round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 6-1 7-6(3) | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Flavia Pennetta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 |