H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 1-3
Kiki Bertens holds a 3–1 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kiki Bertens leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2019 S-Hertogenbosch final 0-6 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2019* | S-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 0-6 7-6(3) 7-5 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kiki Bertens | 6-3 6-3 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| May 27, 2017* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-4 6-3 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2013 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kiki Bertens | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |