H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 0-2
Lucie Safarova holds a 2–0 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 3-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Lucie Safarova | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| May 6, 2015* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Lucie Safarova | 6-4 6-2 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Lucie Safarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |