H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 4-0

Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 4–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2015 Nottingham Open second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alison Riske-Amritraj
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alison Riske-Amritraj #48 6-3 6-4 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #58 Match data Jun 12, 2015* R16 Nottingham Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Alison Riske-Amritraj #43 6-4 6-0 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #59 Match data Mar 26, 2015* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Alison Riske-Amritraj #44 6-2 6-3 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #59 Match data Mar 13, 2015* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Alison Riske-Amritraj #45 7-6(2) 6-3 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #100 Match data May 28, 2014* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,860 189 202 48.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2
19 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2
20 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,528 0 0 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2
21 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,487 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2
22 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,712 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,740 0 1 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2
26 2017 19–24 44.2% #70 1,641 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,626 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2
28 2019 26–22 54.2% #18 1,805 0 2 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,745 0 2 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2
30 2021 16–16 50.0% #51 1,766 0 3 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2
31 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,732 0 3 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2
32 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,602 0 3 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,633 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 2011 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 17 11 28 60.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 9 14 23 39.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 8 10 18 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 17 16 33 51.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2021 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2022 17 14 31 54.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2023 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 119 129 248 48.0% 18 39 57 31.6% 52 34 86 60.5% — — — — — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 369/392 of Alison Riske-Amritraj's and 130/155 of Mirjana Lucic-Baroni's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2010 8/8 2.6 3.9 71.0% 64.5% 45.1% 56.1% 47.4% 58.8% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 11/11 2.9 4.1 66.3% 58.6% 44.6% 49.0% 39.3% 53.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 4/4 1.0 3.5 67.5% 55.7% 43.0% 48.0% 49.7% 51.5% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 17/17 1.8 3.5 67.6% 66.5% 51.0% 58.2% 53.9% 61.5% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 38/46 2.6 4.8 64.2% 64.1% 42.9% 56.1% 48.7% 56.5% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 34/39 1.5 3.6 70.0% 59.7% 52.0% 48.2% 37.9% 57.4% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 40/43 1.5 4.0 66.6% 63.8% 46.0% 52.4% 43.0% 58.2% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 42/43 1.2 3.3 68.0% 62.0% 43.7% 51.2% 44.2% 56.0% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 32/33 2.0 4.2 66.1% 63.1% 48.5% 52.7% 45.7% 58.2% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 48/48 2.3 4.1 66.3% 62.9% 47.4% 52.0% 45.7% 57.7% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 14/14 2.6 6.2 64.4% 64.6% 45.0% 55.3% 55.6% 57.6% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 29/32 2.3 4.1 66.0% 62.3% 46.1% 52.8% 50.3% 56.8% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 44/46 2.1 2.7 66.8% 63.2% 49.8% 50.8% 44.1% 58.6% 42.7% 2013 9/19 4.1 4.1 56.7% 68.4% 48.1% 53.6% 49.9% 59.4% 41.5%
32 2023 8/8 1.1 3.8 65.6% 57.1% 39.0% 41.9% 52.2% 50.8% 34.2% 2014 20/20 4.3 5.3 53.7% 68.8% 48.0% 62.8% 45.7% 59.1% 44.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 29/43 3.6 6.9 56.7% 63.3% 46.8% 46.1% 48.6% 56.4% 38.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 31/32 2.5 6.3 55.5% 65.0% 41.4% 44.4% 54.4% 54.7% 47.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 36/36 3.2 6.6 57.5% 64.6% 41.2% 51.9% 58.5% 54.6% 43.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 5/5 1.4 5.2 54.9% 60.4% 37.5% 48.1% 68.9% 50.9% 37.9%
Career — 369/392 2.0 3.9 66.8% 62.7% 46.8% 52.2% 45.8% 57.4% 42.7% — 130/302 3.3 6.2 56.1% 65.1% 43.9% 50.4% 53.2% 55.9% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +120 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.58
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.60
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28
19 2010 1555 111.2 +1.84 -2.58 0.891 48.4% — — +148 47.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.6 -0.48 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02
20 2011 1529 104.5 -0.76 -3.92 0.787 45.3% -61 — +195 30.8% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.54 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
21 2012 1488 105.5 -0.75 -1.19 0.819 45.5% -48 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.29 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09
22 2013 1641 130.7 +2.70 -0.60 1.122 52.3% -106 — +142 62.5% +0.75 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 1712 132.8 +0.21 -0.06 1.000 49.9% -36 -193 +87 52.0% +0.24 4–6 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 101.2 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 1603 124.5 -0.32 -1.07 0.947 48.9% -8 -94 +139 40.2% -0.55 4–9 (31%) 2–6 (25%) 90.8 -1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 1741 129.3 +1.19 +1.21 1.075 51.5% +6 -229 +1 54.0% +0.29 8–10 (44%) 5–11 (31%) 94.1 -0.28 2007 1537 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.13
26 2017 1642 129.3 +0.27 -0.29 0.966 49.2% -18 -76 +133 45.5% -0.33 6–7 (46%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -2.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 1626 131.0 +1.17 +1.53 1.083 51.5% -55 -21 +173 51.9% +0.31 5–10 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 96.8 -0.45 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18
28 2019 1806 145.4 +1.26 +1.59 1.017 50.2% -57 -289 +135 50.4% +0.04 14–9 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.5 -1.98 2010 1554 111.8 — — — — -70 — +160 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.12
29 2020 1745 135.6 -0.19 +1.24 1.039 50.8% +5 — — 48.6% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 0.00 2011 1551 110.1 — — — — -82 +119 +144 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83
30 2021 1767 130.1 +0.04 +0.89 1.022 50.4% +21 — +165 51.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +0.58 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +122 +176 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36
31 2022 1732 137.6 +1.42 +0.41 1.033 50.6% +25 -253 +159 49.5% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 101.9 +0.60 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31
32 2023 1603 111.8 -2.22 -2.80 0.696 42.6% +41 — — 22.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.21 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -115 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1625 127.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -46 +79 -10 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +7 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03
Career — 1860 137.7 +0.67 +0.22 1.002 50.0% -17 -149 +135 48.5% -0.06 64–83 (44%) 49–64 (43%) 93.8 -1.51 — 1799 132.5 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.