H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 4-0

Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 4–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2015 Nottingham fourth round 6-3 6-4.

USA Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 12, 2015* Nottingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Alison Riske-Amritraj #48 6-3 6-4 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #58 Match data
Mar 24, 2015* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #43 6-4 6-0 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #59 Match data
Mar 10, 2015* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #44 6-2 6-3 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #59 Match data
May 28, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Alison Riske-Amritraj #45 7-6(2) 6-3 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,853 191 202 48.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,692 0 1
16 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,776 0 2
17 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,757 0 2
18 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,601 0 2
19 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,596 0 2
20 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,529 0 0 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,546 0 2
21 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,488 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,526 0 2
22 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,642 0 0
23 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,713 0 1
24 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,742 0 1 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,538 0 2
26 2017 21–24 46.7% #70 1,650 0 1
27 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,632 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,519 0 2
28 2019 26–23 53.1% #18 1,797 0 2 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,739 0 2 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2
30 2021 16–15 51.6% #51 1,771 0 3 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2
31 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,750 0 3 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,563 0 2
32 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,614 0 3 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3
33 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,657 0 3
34 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,629 0 3
35 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,698 0 3
36 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,689 0 3