H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Alison Riske-Amritraj vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-3

Venus Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2017 Cincinnati second round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alison Riske-Amritraj
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 2017* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #9 6-2 6-0 Alison Riske-Amritraj #46 Match data
Jul 23, 2016* Stanford WTA 500 SF Hard Venus Williams #7 6-1 7-6(2) Alison Riske-Amritraj #78 Match data
Apr 7, 2016* Charleston WTA 500 R32 Clay Venus Williams #14 6-4 6-2 Alison Riske-Amritraj #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,853 191 202 48.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Riske-Amritraj Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,529 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,488 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,642 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,713 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,742 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2017 21–24 46.7% #70 1,650 0 1 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,632 0 1 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2019 26–23 53.1% #18 1,797 0 2 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,739 0 2 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2021 16–15 51.6% #51 1,771 0 3 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,750 0 3 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,614 0 3 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47