H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Alla Kudryavtseva vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Alla Kudryavtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2013 Stanford third round 6-1 6-7(4) 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2013* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tamira Paszek | 6-1 6-7(4) 3-0 (ret.) | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alla Kudryavtseva | #841 | #56 | 1,056 | 1,670 | 85 | 138 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alla Kudryavtseva | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #212 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,506 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #98 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #142 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |