H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Allison Bradshaw vs Marissa Irvin H2H: 1-0

Allison Bradshaw holds a 1–0 lead over Marissa Irvin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Allison Bradshaw leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Allison Bradshaw won the 2000 US Open second round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Allison Bradshaw
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Marissa Irvin
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Allison Bradshaw #276 6-3 6-1 Marissa Irvin #78 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Allison Bradshaw #984 #102 325 1,579 7 8 46.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marissa Irvin #854 #51 652 1,603 37 80 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Allison Bradshaw Marissa Irvin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #412 1,495 0 0
19 2000 2–1 66.7% #134 1,538 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #131 1,487 0 0
20 2001 5–6 45.5% #149 1,570 0 0 2000 4–7 36.4% #88 1,505 0 0
21 2002 0–1 0.0% #261 1,557 0 0 2001 8–14 36.4% #64 1,571 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2002 9–18 33.3% #77 1,572 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2003 3–11 21.4% #141 1,502 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2004 7–13 35.0% #72 1,499 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2005 6–14 30.0% #128 1,505 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Allison Bradshaw Marissa Irvin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2001 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 8 11 19 42.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 8 9 11.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — 26 52 78 33.3% 10 17 27 37.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Allison Bradshaw Marissa Irvin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1496 101.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.04
19 2000 1539 117.5 — — — — +38 — — 66.7% +1.17 — 0–1 — +0.07 1999 1487 102.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.30
20 2001 1570 110.5 — — — — +37 — — 41.4% -0.90 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 105.9 -0.25 2000 1505 117.5 — — — — +18 — — 39.3% -0.64 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 0.00
21 2002 1558 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 2001 1572 122.9 — — — — -1 -33 — 38.9% -0.74 5–5 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 -1.30
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1572 129.6 — — — — +40 -62 — 37.1% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 99.1 -1.41
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1503 104.4 — — — — +12 +35 — 30.3% -1.57 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 +0.46
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1500 126.9 — — — — -10 +82 — 38.6% -0.23 1–5 (17%) 3–8 (27%) 93.1 +0.59
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1506 112.6 — — — — -46 +67 — 36.2% -1.38 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 100.0 -0.56
Career — 1579 112.0 — — — — +37 — — 43.2% -0.68 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 105.2 -1.20 — 1604 125.7 — — — — +5 +17 — 36.4% -0.97 15–30 (33%) 16–17 (48%) 97.1 -2.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.