H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Alicia Molik H2H: 1-1
Alona Bondarenko and Alicia Molik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2007 Hobart fourth round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2007* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Alicia Molik | 6-3 7-5 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2005* | Bali | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Alona Bondarenko | 6-4 6-2 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Alicia Molik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |