H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 2-0
Alona Bondarenko holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alona Bondarenko leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alona Bondarenko won the 2005 Estoril third round 6-2 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2005* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Alona Bondarenko | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2005* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Alona Bondarenko | 7-6(1) 1-0 (ret.) | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Jelena Dokic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 |