H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Julie Ditty H2H: 1-1
Alona Bondarenko and Julie Ditty are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alona Bondarenko leads 1–0 on clay, while Julie Ditty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alona Bondarenko won the 2010 Charleston second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Alona Bondarenko | 6-4 6-2 | Julie Ditty | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2008* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Julie Ditty | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Julie Ditty | #674 | #89 | 620 | 1,544 | 10 | 28 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Julie Ditty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #101 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #113 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #310 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #456 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |