H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Karolina Sprem H2H: 1-1
Alona Bondarenko and Karolina Sprem are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alona Bondarenko leads 1–0 on clay, while Karolina Sprem leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alona Bondarenko won the 2009 Budapest third round 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2009* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Alona Bondarenko | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Karolina Sprem | 6-4 6-2 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Karolina Sprem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |