H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 2-1
Alona Bondarenko holds a 2–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alona Bondarenko leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alona Bondarenko won the 2009 New Haven third round 4-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2009* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alona Bondarenko | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2009* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Alona Bondarenko | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Meghann Shaughnessy | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |