H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alycia Moulton vs Annabel Croft H2H: 3-0
Alycia Moulton holds a 3–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alycia Moulton leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alycia Moulton won the 1986 Princeton third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1986* | Princeton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Alycia Moulton | 6-1 6-2 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1985* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Alycia Moulton | 6-1 6-2 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| May 11, 1985* | Australian Indoor | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Alycia Moulton | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alycia Moulton | #253 | #18 | 22 | 1,923 | 145 | 128 | 53.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alycia Moulton | Annabel Croft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 37–23 | 61.7% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #19 | 1,856 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #20 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |