H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alycia Moulton vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 0-3
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 3–0 lead over Alycia Moulton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1985 Wimbledon third round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1985* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 7-6 6-4 | Alycia Moulton | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1984* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-7 7-6 3-0 (ret.) | Alycia Moulton | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1982* | San Diego | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 0-6 7-6 6-3 | Alycia Moulton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alycia Moulton | #253 | #18 | 22 | 1,923 | 145 | 128 | 53.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alycia Moulton | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1979 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1981 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1982 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1983 | 37–23 | 61.7% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1984 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #19 | 1,856 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1985 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #20 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1986 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1987 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |