H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alycia Moulton vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 2-2
Alycia Moulton and Tina Mochizuki are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tina Mochizuki leads 1–0 on carpet, while Alycia Moulton leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tina Mochizuki won the 1985 Dallas third round 6-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1985* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tina Mochizuki | 6-3 (ret.) | Alycia Moulton | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1984* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Alycia Moulton | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
| May 25, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Alycia Moulton | 6-0 7-6 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1981* | Fayetteville | WTA 250 | SF | — | Tina Mochizuki | 6-4 6-3 | Alycia Moulton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alycia Moulton | #253 | #18 | 22 | 1,923 | 145 | 128 | 53.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alycia Moulton | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 37–23 | 61.7% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #19 | 1,856 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #20 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 |