H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Amanda Brown vs Annabel Croft H2H: 1-2

Annabel Croft holds a 2–1 lead over Amanda Brown in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on carpet, while Amanda Brown leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1985 Melbourne quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

H2H
1 2
3 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 6-4 6-3 Amanda Brown Match data May 18, 1985* QF Melbourne WTA 250 Carpet
Amanda Brown 7-6 7-6 Annabel Croft Match data Nov 21, 1984* R64 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Annabel Croft 6-1 6-3 Amanda Brown Match data Apr 13, 1982* SF Norwich WTA 250

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Brown 1,653 48 55 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Annabel Croft 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Brown Annabel Croft
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
14 1981 9–5 64.3% 1,535 0 0
15 1980 1–3 25.0% 1,475 0 0 1982 14–9 60.9% 1,588 0 0
16 1981 9–4 69.2% 1,559 0 0 1983 6–7 46.2% 1,595 0 0
17 1982 12–4 75.0% 1,635 0 0 1984 11–14 44.0% 1,615 0 0
18 1983 7–12 36.8% 1,595 0 1 1985 23–20 53.5% 1,761 0 1
19 1984 14–18 43.8% 1,611 0 1 1986 10–19 34.5% 1,653 0 1
20 1985 5–13 27.8% 1,577 0 1 1987 8–14 36.4% 1,574 0 1
21 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,556 0 1 1988 3–3 50.0% 1,562 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Brown Annabel Croft
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
15 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
16 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1982 2 0 2 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
18 1983 2 4 6 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
19 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
20 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 3 6 50.0%
Career 13 15 28 46.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Brown Annabel Croft
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.31
14 1981 1535 118.4 +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 +0.81
15 1980 1476 101.6 25.0% -1.00 -0.05 1982 1589 120.1 +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 +2.10
16 1981 1560 119.3 66.7% +1.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.47 1983 1595 118.1 -29 +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.87
17 1982 1635 123.4 -58 73.5% +2.32 1–1 2–0 +2.21 1984 1615 118.2 -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
18 1983 1596 107.2 -21 -2 38.1% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +0.68 1985 1762 133.2 +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98
19 1984 1611 109.9 -60 -13 +27 44.6% -0.58 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 103.1 +1.65 1986 1653 120.6 +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89
20 1985 1578 109.4 -9 -25 29.3% -1.41 3–2 (60%) 1–1 -0.07 1987 1575 108.2 +47 -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97
21 1986 1556 98.8 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.31 1988 1562 97.6 +29 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) +0.72
Career 1654 115.8 -38 -36 +1 46.7% -0.16 12–13 (48%) 13–8 (62%) 102.5 +5.05 1780 125.1 +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.