H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amanda Brown vs Annabel Croft H2H: 1-2
Annabel Croft holds a 2–1 lead over Amanda Brown in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on carpet, while Amanda Brown leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1985 Melbourne quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1985* | Melbourne | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Annabel Croft | 6-4 6-3 | Amanda Brown | Match data |
| Nov 21, 1984* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Amanda Brown | 7-6 7-6 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1982* | Norwich | WTA 250 | SF | — | Annabel Croft | 6-1 6-3 | Amanda Brown | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Brown | — | — | — | 1,656 | 48 | 55 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Brown | Annabel Croft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1981 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 12–4 | 75.0% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |