H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Amanda Brown vs B Pearson H2H: 1-0

Amanda Brown holds a 1–0 lead over B Pearson in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Amanda Brown won the 1981 Norwich round of 16 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Brown
GBR Age 61
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
B Pearson
AUS

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Brown 6-1 6-4 B Pearson Match data Apr 10, 1981* R16 Norwich WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Brown — — — 1,653 48 55 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
B Pearson — — — 1,517 2 4 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Amanda Brown B Pearson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,501 0 0
1981 9–4 69.2% — 1,559 0 0 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,467 0 0
1982 12–4 75.0% — 1,635 0 0 — — — — — — —
1983 7–12 36.8% — 1,595 0 1 — — — — — — —
1984 14–18 43.8% — 1,611 0 1 — — — — — — —
1985 5–13 27.8% — 1,577 0 1 — — — — — — —
1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Amanda Brown B Pearson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1476 101.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.00 — — — -0.05 1980 1501 94.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.34
1981 1560 119.3 — — — — — — — 66.7% +1.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.47 1981 1467 94.0 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.20
1982 1635 123.4 — — — — — -58 — 73.5% +2.32 1–1 2–0 — +2.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1596 107.2 — — — — -21 — -2 38.1% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 1611 109.9 — — — — -60 -13 +27 44.6% -0.58 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 103.1 +1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 1578 109.4 — — — — -9 — -25 29.3% -1.41 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 1556 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1654 115.8 — — — — -38 -36 +1 46.7% -0.16 12–13 (48%) 13–8 (62%) 102.5 +5.05 Career 1517 94.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.47 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +9.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.