H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amanda Brown vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-1

Amanda Brown and Nathalie Herreman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Brown leads 1–0 on grass, while Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1984 Nashville round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Brown
GBR Age 61
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #118 6-4 6-3 Amanda Brown Match data Jan 5, 1984* R32 Nashville WTA 250 Hard
Amanda Brown 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Herreman Match data Nov 17, 1983* R32 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Brown — — — 1,653 48 55 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Brown Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 9–4 69.2% — 1,559 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1982 12–4 75.0% — 1,635 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1983 7–12 36.8% — 1,595 0 1 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1984 14–18 43.8% — 1,611 0 1 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1985 5–13 27.8% — 1,577 0 1 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,556 0 1 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Brown Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1982 2 0 2 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1983 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 13 15 28 46.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 2 6 8 25.0% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Brown Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1476 101.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1560 119.3 — — — — — — — 66.7% +1.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.47 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1982 1635 123.4 — — — — — -58 — 73.5% +2.32 1–1 2–0 — +2.21 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1983 1596 107.2 — — — — -21 — -2 38.1% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +0.68 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1984 1611 109.9 — — — — -60 -13 +27 44.6% -0.58 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 103.1 +1.65 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1985 1578 109.4 — — — — -9 — -25 29.3% -1.41 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.07 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1986 1556 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.31 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 1654 115.8 — — — — -38 -36 +1 46.7% -0.16 12–13 (48%) 13–8 (62%) 102.5 +5.05 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.